Two lists of requirements: the authorised one and the one in the terms

What the authorised shopfront asks for, and in what order

Law 14,790/2023 organised fixed-odds betting in Brazil and handed the Prizes and Betting Secretariat of the Ministry of Finance the task of authorising who operates. An authorised house appears at an address ending in .bet.br, and that suffix is the visible part of the arrangement.

The order there is: identify first, bet afterwards.

Since 1 January 2025, identifying the bettor has been compulsory at those houses. Sign-up asks for verifiable personal data, the minimum age is 18, and money goes in and out through a bank account in the bettor's own name, in reais, over the national payment infrastructure. Cryptocurrency is not part of that design, and that is where the search that brought you to this site comes from.

The text of the law is published on the Planalto portal and the list of who received an authorisation is kept by the body itself.

What the ten houses ask for, and when

On the other side the sequence inverts, and the inversion is the product.

Sign-up asks for an email address and little else. The deposit arrives in cryptocurrency, without passing through a Brazilian bank. None of it is done in secret: it is written in the terms, and the terms also say the house may ask for a document at any moment, with particular emphasis on the moment of withdrawal.

Across a hundred brands in our library, the identity clause could be read in 49. All 49 reserve that right to the house. What varies is whether an amount is written beside it, and an amount exists in five — three of which are in this site's table: Bitcasino.io at €2,500 in clause 6.6, Rocketpot at $2,500 in clause 11.4, and Empire.io at 2,000 USDT in clause 5.4.

In the rest, the clause describes a criterion of the house's own, with no figure, and the full reading is in identity verification.

The same requirement at two different moments

Set side by side, the two lists agree on content and diverge on the calendar.

An identity document: required on both sides. A minimum age of 18: required on both sides. A check on the source of funds: provided for on both sides. A deadline for responding to the request: exists on both sides, and on the side of the ten it usually comes with a described consequence for not responding, running from a blocked account to a cancelled withdrawal.

The difference is in when the account meets the requirement.

At the authorised shopfront, that meeting happens before any money goes in. On the side of the ten, it happens after the money is in and at the instant it tries to leave. For anyone depositing, that changes one practical thing: the cost of finding out late is higher than the cost of finding out early, because finding out late means a balance sitting still.

Where the real meets the two lists

There is a third set of rules that almost no comparison shows, and it is Brazilian.

To reach the cashier of any of the ten houses, the real has to become a coin somewhere, and that somewhere is usually an exchange operating in the country. The exchange asks for a CPF at sign-up, because anyone operating here has that obligation.

The result is that the identification the house deferred happens anyway, one step earlier, under rules that are neither the house's nor the authorised shopfront's. The path is drawn in real, Pix and crypto.

What the foreign licence does and does not do

All ten houses publish a licence number, and the number can be checked in the register of the authority that issued it. Six come from Curaçao, four from Anjouan.

That number proves a registration exists. It does not prove payment, does not prove a term, and does not substitute for a Brazilian authorisation.

Nor is it permanent: in the library of a hundred brands, five are recorded with a revoked registration, and three of those five share the same number. What can and cannot be concluded from such a number is in the foreign licence.

Three sentences this site refuses to write

The first is “it is legal to play here”. That is not what we say and not what the documents allow anyone to say.

The second is any instruction for escaping an identity check, a location check or any other check. We give none, neither as a tip nor as a warning about somebody else's tip.

The third is “we tested it”. We hold an account with no operator and have deposited no money, so there is not a line on this site about a timed withdrawal or customer service experienced first-hand. What exists is a document, a clause and a date, as the methodology explains.

For anyone looking for the authorised route

If what you want is the shopfront with a Brazilian authorisation, the list of who holds one is kept by the Prizes and Betting Secretariat of the Ministry of Finance, and the address ends in .bet.br. This site neither reproduces nor comments on it: that is not its subject.

The subject here is the other side, told through its own documents.

And anyone wanting to know which of these houses wrote Brazil's name into their own text will find the count in who accepts Brazil, with the four exceptions named.

Questions about the two lists

The answers below repeat only what is written above, with the source beside them.