Where each figure comes from, and what we do with what is missing

An empty cell is a dash, not a zero

The second rule is the one that most changes how the table looks, and it costs white space.

Empty is not zero, is not “no limit” and is not “no verification”.

If the ceiling column shows a dash, the ceiling may exist without being published. If the country-list cell shows a dash, no published list is on file. Treating those absences as a quality would reward precisely whoever publishes least, and the full inventory of them is in what the table does not say.

The five criteria

The order comes from five checks, the same for every house, and each one is answered by the operator's own documents.

The terms contain an identity-verification clause; they say when the check starts; they print an amount; they set a deadline for documents; and the licence resolves in the register of the authority that issued it, for the operator's own domain. Bitcasino.io, for example, prints €2,500 in clause 6.6, and Rocketpot gives 30 calendar days for documents in clause 12.2.

The denominator is fixed on purpose.

Scoring only on the fields a house filled in would promote whoever publishes least, which is the opposite of what a comparison should produce. A missing field scores nothing on that criterion, without shrinking the total, and ties are ordered alphabetically.

What the score does and does not say

The score counts documents, not stars. A house near the top is one whose terms and register answer more of the five questions, and nothing beyond that.

A house with more filled fields is not a better house. It is a more legible one.

That holds even against common sense: a house publishing a low ceiling is saying more than one publishing no ceiling at all, and the first appears better placed for having published, not for being generous. The criterion for each field is in withdrawals and limits.

The advertising, said out loud

It stands above the ranking without a number.

It is not ranked against the other houses.

Its facts are printed the same way as anyone else's: licence OGL/2024/1676/0905, whose certificate listed only vavegame.com in the register on 12 September 2026, and clause 8.7, which lets Vave ask for identity before any payout. An advertiser that publishes little is a fact about the advertiser, and the table says so rather than borrowing figures from somewhere else.

What this site does not write, by decision

Three sentences are barred here, and the bar applies to every page.

A promised payout time: the two real-money tests, at Vave on 28 August 2026 and at TrustDice in May 2026, are described as observations, and no house gets a withdrawal time. A verdict on playing: the Brazilian picture is gathered in two lists of requirements. And any instruction for escaping an identity check or any other check, which we give neither as a tip nor as a warning about somebody else's tip.

Bonus size stays outside the score, because it says nothing about the clauses that govern a withdrawal.

Dates, and why they sit beside every figure

All data ages, and terms-of-use data ages fast.

The readings behind the ranking were made between 26 August and 13 September 2026, at each house's own address and in the registers, and every cell carries its own date.

The date sits beside the figure because it is what allows anyone to disagree with us.

Whoever opens the same document today and finds something different is right, and the route for doing that in fifteen minutes is in checking it yourself.

Who writes this, and what that means

This site is written by an editorial desk that reads documents, not by somebody who bets. Apart from the two real-money tests at Vave and TrustDice, there is no account of experience here.

What exists is reading, counting and clause citation.

Anyone looking for an opinion on which house is more fun will find that better somewhere else. Anyone wanting to know which company signs the contract, when documents start being asked for and how much it is written that you can withdraw will find it here, with the clause number beside it, and the details are in identity verification and in the foreign licence.

Corrections

Errors happen, and the worst thing to do with one is erase it without notice.

When we find an error of ours, we correct the page and say what changed. When the change comes from the house rather than from us, the old date stays recorded beside the old reading, because the difference between the two is information.

A document outranks our reading of it.

If you found a discrepancy, it is almost certainly ours or a recent change in the house's text, and in both cases the route is the same: open the document, look at the clause and check the date.

Questions about the method

The answers below repeat the rules above, with no exception for the advertiser.