Where each figure comes from, and what we do with what is missing
This site reads documents: licence registers and terms published by the houses themselves. We hold an account at no operator, we deposit no money and we measure no withdrawal times. Every cell in the table carries the clause it came from and the day the text was opened, and what we could not read is recorded as unread.
One source counts: the house's own document
This site has one rule above all the others, and it decides what can and cannot appear in a cell.
A figure only enters if it sits in a public document we can cite: the register of the authority that issued the licence, or the terms published by the house.
Other people's comparisons are not a source. Numbers circulating in recommendation lists are not a source. If an amount appears on several sites and in no document, it does not appear here, and that is the origin of most of our gaps.
An empty field means unread
The second rule is the one that most changes how the table looks, and it costs white space.
Empty is not zero, is not “no limit” and is not “no verification”.
If the ceiling column is empty, the ceiling may exist without being published. If the country list is empty, it may exist and we may simply have failed to open it. Treating those absences as a quality would reward precisely whoever publishes least, and the full inventory of them is in what the table does not say.
How the ten houses got into the table
The choice is arithmetic over the library of a hundred brands, not editorial opinion.
Out go anyone naming Brazil in their own barred-country list, anyone whose licence registration is recorded as revoked, and anyone who could not be read at all. Among the rest, the order comes from a fixed set of checks, the same for all: a licence number exists, the number resolves in the authority's register, a named company exists, a published verification amount exists, a cited clause exists, a published ceiling exists, a coin list exists, and the reading was made at the house's own address.
The denominator is fixed on purpose.
Scoring only on the fields a house filled in would promote whoever publishes least, which is the opposite of what a comparison should produce. A missing field scores zero on that check, without shrinking the total.
The order of the rows is not a ranking
The table has no score, no stars and no podium. The order serves to put near the top the houses about which there is more document read, and nothing beyond that.
A house with more filled fields is not a better house. It is a more legible one.
That holds even against common sense: a house publishing a low ceiling is saying more than one publishing no ceiling at all, and the first appears better placed for having published, not for being generous. The criterion for each field is in withdrawals and limits.
The advertising, said out loud
Vave is this site's advertiser. The link to it is paid, it is marked as advertising, and it occupies the first row of the table for that reason.
It enters no count, receives no score and is not compared with the other nine.
Two of its documents we managed to read: the licence register, checked on 2 September 2026, and clause 8.7 on the request for documents. Its country list was not read, and the cell is marked as unchecked, exactly as it would be for any other house. An advertiser that publishes little is a fact about the advertiser, and the table says so rather than borrowing figures from somewhere else.
What this site does not write, by decision
Three sentences are barred here, and the bar applies to every page.
“We tested it”: we hold no account, we deposited nothing and we measured nothing. “It is legal to play here”: the houses compared do not appear on the list of authorised operators kept by the Prizes and Betting Secretariat of the Ministry of Finance, and the picture is gathered in two lists of requirements. And any instruction for escaping an identity check or any other check, which we give neither as a tip nor as a warning about somebody else's tip.
We also publish no bonus amount, because we have no field from which to copy one with a clause beside it.
Dates, and why they sit beside every figure
All data ages, and terms-of-use data ages fast.
The readings of the ten houses date from 26 August 2026, with Vave checked again on 2 September 2026. One of the ten, Empire.io, was read from an archived copy of the document; the other nine at the house's own address.
The date sits beside the figure because it is what allows anyone to disagree with us.
Whoever opens the same document today and finds something different is right, and the route for doing that in fifteen minutes is in checking it yourself.
Who writes this, and what that means
This site is written by an editorial desk that reads documents, not by somebody who bets. There is no account of experience here, because there is no experience to recount.
What exists is reading, counting and clause citation.
Anyone looking for an opinion on which house is more fun will find that better somewhere else. Anyone wanting to know which company signs the contract, when documents start being asked for and how much it is written that you can withdraw will find it here, with the clause number beside it, and the counts are in identity verification and in the foreign licence.
Corrections
Errors happen, and the worst thing to do with one is erase it without notice.
When we find an error of ours, we correct the page and say what changed. When the change comes from the house rather than from us, the old date stays recorded beside the old reading, because the difference between the two is information.
A document outranks our reading of it.
If you found a discrepancy, it is almost certainly ours or a recent change in the house's text, and in both cases the route is the same: open the document, look at the clause and check the date.
Questions about the method
The answers below repeat the rules above, with no exception for the advertiser.
Did you test these houses with your own money?
No. We hold an account at no operator and have deposited not one real. So there is not a line on this site about a timed withdrawal, about customer service or about winning. What exists is a document number, a clause number and a date of reading.
How did you choose the ten houses in the table?
By arithmetic over the library of a hundred brands, with a fixed denominator: every brand is scored against the same set of checks, and a missing field scores zero on that check without shrinking the total. Brands whose licence is recorded as revoked stay out, and so do brands that could not be read at all. Anyone naming Brazil in their own country list is excluded.
Does Vave appear first on merit?
No. Vave is paid advertising and occupies the first row because of that, which the table itself says. It enters no count on this site, receives no score and is not compared with the other nine. Its country list was not read, and the corresponding cell is marked as unchecked.
What do you do when you get something wrong?
We correct the page and say what changed, without erasing the record of the error. If you opened a document and found something different from what is written here, the document is right: it is the source, and our reading is dated.