The coins at the cashier: where the lists agree and where they part

Start with the coin you hold

Most readers arrive with bitcoin, ether or tether, so the first check is simply whether that coin stands in the list, and on which network.

After those names the lists diverge, and the long ones add coins that few people carry.

The tail is what separates a long list from a short one

The practical conclusion comes out of reading them that way, and it runs against how the lists are sold.

Anyone arriving with bitcoin, ether or tether in their wallet rarely gains anything from a longer list. A long list only makes a difference to someone carrying monero, dash, polkadot or a network-specific token, and that is a narrow audience.

Counting coins measures the catalogue, not the cashier.

Nothing in the count tells you the withdrawal time, the ceiling or the request for a document, which are the fields where money actually jams. Those are in withdrawals and limits and in identity verification.

Tether written twice, and what that reveals

There is a detail in Rocketpot's list that almost no comparison records, and it is worth more than half the exotic names put together.

The house writes tether twice, once for each network on which it accepts it. That is not redundancy: it is an acknowledgement that the same coin, on different networks, costs different fees and arrives in different times.

The coin is the same; the rail is not.

Anyone who sends on one network and expects to receive on another usually discovers the problem halfway. Not every list makes that distinction in writing, which does not mean the networks do not exist there; it means only that the document does not separate them.

The house's own token joins the list

Shuffle's coin list includes a token issued by the house itself.

That is neither a defect nor a merit, but it changes the nature of the item. The other coins on the list exist outside the site and can be taken away; an in-house token is worth something inside the environment that issued it, and its value depends on whoever issued it.

That is why this site records the list as written and does not reduce it to a loose number. The number is what usually becomes the headline in other people's comparisons, and it is the least informative thing there.

The figure that is in no document at all

There is a cost that runs through every one of these lists and appears in none of the terms on file: the fee the coin's network charges to move the money.

Whoever charges that fee is not the house. It is the network, and it varies with congestion at the moment.

Since we do not have that figure in a document, it does not enter a column and does not enter an estimate. A made-up number in that field would be comfortable for whoever is writing and expensive for whoever is reading, and the inventory of such absences is in what the table does not say.

Three houses declare they work in cryptocurrency only

Among the ranked houses, three describe themselves as cryptocurrency-only: Metaspins, Rocketpot and Wolfbet.

The difference matters less than it looks for anyone in Brazil.

For a reader who holds reais, the practical question is where the real becomes a coin before it reaches the cashier.

Where the real becomes a coin

The real usually becomes cryptocurrency before the casino, at an exchange operating in Brazil, and that exchange asks for a CPF at sign-up. So an identification exists along the way even when the house asks for none.

That step usually falls outside comparisons, and it is drawn in full in real, Pix and crypto. The frame of the two orders of requirement, the authorised shopfront's and the terms', is in two lists of requirements.

Questions about the coins at the cashier

The answers below come from the coin lists on file, and say when a cell shows a dash.